Summer Winos»Uncategorized»Series 6 Episode 2: Car and Garter

Series 6 Episode 2: Car and Garter

In which Compo feels the need for speed…

Bob: Can I admit to a little tingle of excitement every time we reach the debut episode of a regular character?

Andrew: Please do! We’d better enjoy the experience before saying goodbye to people becomes a more common occurrence.

Bob: Oof, you morbid soul. But ladies and gentlemen, it’s Wesley Pegden! As soon as I saw smoke billowing from beneath a garage door, and the sound of a muffled explosion, I knew exactly who we were going to meet.

There’s a classic opening line to this episode as well: ‘How do you get marmalade off a ferret?’ asks Compo. It’s one of life’s eternal mysteries, isn’t it? Also, an exchange that I remember heartily laughing at back in 1982, and my dad doing likewise…

Compo: When you straighten up, why doesn’t the blood rush straight to your feet?

Foggy: You don’t think anything’s going to be in a rush to get to your feet…

Brian Wilde’s delivery is a perfect mix of warmth, self-satisfaction and disdain. And I cannot help but feel hugely sentimental whenever I hear a line in anything that made my dad and I laugh together. I know them all when I hear them… in Fawlty Towers, Monty Python, Porridge, you name it… as soon as I hear that line – even if it’s for the first time in thirty years – I’m transported back to the front room, and a little routine we would play out: if we both laughed simultaneously at the same thing, then immediately afterwards we’d exchange a fleeting look of mutual appreciation across the room. It was completely involuntary, and my mum found it fascinating. But I’ve always shared a sense of humour with my dad, and we absolutely bonded over TV comedy. And he had fabulously progressive tastes… I know plenty of my contemporaries who were banned from watching The Young Ones when they were kids, but I was introduced to it by my dad. He loved it, and we watched it together… along with all of the edgiest 80s TV comedy you could think of. One of the highlights of my early teenage years was staying up late on a Friday night and watching the likes of Who Dares Wins on Channel 4 with him. Thanks, Dad.

Introducing Wesley!

And I’ve just realized that the above paragraph makes it sound like my dad is dead! He’s not everyone, he’s fine. Cancel the flowers.

Andrew: Good to hear, I’m always on the lookout for a guest reviewer…

Bob: I love Gordon Wharmby in Summer Wine, although has he been surrounded by a bit of urban mythologizing over the years? I’m sure I remember reading somewhere that he was a local amateur dramatics enthusiast without a previous professional acting credit, but that does him a bit of a disservice. True, he wasn’t a trained thespian and combined part-time acting with a day job as a painter and decorator, but he had been part of Oldham Repertory Theatre, and had also done small parts in Coronation Street, amongst others.

What I didn’t realise was that he’d actually auditioned to play the angry man on the roof at the end of the previous episode, In The Service Of Humanity! It’s a one-line part (‘Hey, bring back that ladder!’ ), but he impressed Roy Clarke and Alan JW Bell so much that they asked him to read for Wesley in Car and Garter. Bell, apparently, found ‘absolutely real’ , and the part was his. However, Wesley was – I’ve read – previously earmarked as a guest role for a well-known TV actor! Anyone know who that might be? This could be Summer Wine’s April Walker moment!

Andrew: I wonder if, as they were casting this part, Clarke and Bell were specifically looking for a Fred Dibnah type. The Bolton-born steeplejack first rose to fame in 1978 and, although it never struck me until now, Wesley’s likeness to the man is striking.

And A brief detour to the café sees Sid being harassed by Ivy. Has the phrase, ‘in the kitchen’ ever been spoken with such menace? What really struck me about the scene, however, is the smattering of applause it receives at the end. This is unusual in Summer Wine land and, although I’m not trying to be critical, I don’t understand what the scene did to elicit such a reaction. It’s not a standout. Perhaps scenes routinely received this sort of reaction and, under newcomer Alan Bell, a tiny snippet accidentally made it through to the final edit.

Fred Dibnah... the proto-Wesley?

Fred Dibnah… the proto-Wesley?

Bob: There’s a staggering scene in Clegg’s house that actually made me rewind the DVD to double check that I’d heard it correctly. They’re talking about Sid, and Foggy – rather amazingly – delivers the opinion that (brace yourself) ‘Ivy seems him as something of a big dick’ .

Whhhhhhhhat?!?!? It’s not even a one-off. ‘There are far too many boring, serious beggars about,’ muses Clegg, immediately afterwards. ‘We need all the big daft dicks we can get’ .

Am I being incredibly prudish here? It’s hilarious, but I always thought ‘dick’ was up there with ‘cock’ and ‘prick’ as an insult I wouldn’t have expected to hear in Summer Wine! Certainly not in this later era, anyway. The reaction from the studio audience suggests that they’re a bit taken aback as well!

Andrew: Well, according to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the genital connotation in the word is attested in an 1891 dictionary of Farmer’s Slang. Then there is the ‘ Clever Dick’ , which has been used as recently as a 2012 game show C4 hosted by Anne Widdicome entitled Cleverdicks. I realise that none of this answers your question, but it’s nice to make the effort sometimes.

Bob: I still think this is filth, and should be banned. Neverthless we get to the crux of the episode… Wesley is building what he sees as the ultimate high-performance car, and needs a test-driver, and our heroes volunteer Sid for the job, believing it will increase his standing in Ivy’s eyes. It’s interesting to see that, in these early stages, Wesley clearly isn’t taken with Compo’s sense of humour – there’s a real prickliness to their exchanges.

Andrew: And then we encounter another odd audience response. We cut to a close-up of Foggy, and the audience roars with laughter. It isn’t until a few seconds later that we cut to a wide shot which reveals Sid in his ridiculous racing gear. Usually, during this kind of sitcom gag, the set and performers are shielded from the audience. They only see the action play out on monitors, just like viewers at home. I’m convinced these moments have something to do with a change in production techniques, maybe the studio floor layout had been modified.

Bob: I didn’t notice any of this! It’s all real to me, guv. What is this ‘studio floor’ of which you speak? Ivy, meanwhile, is having none of Sid’s daredevil exploits and forbids him to take part (as well as taking a little sideswipe at his implied proclivities – ‘ Don’t be making a fool of yourself if that bus conductress comes in, and don’t have her poking my sandwiches with her bell finger!’ ) and so – predictably enough – Compo is roped in to drive Wesley’s cobbled-together sports car.

Compo gets his motor running…

Andrew: It’s a cliché, but women really are unpredictable sometimes. Just the other week, Emma was upset with me. By way of apology, I baked her a loaf of break in the shape of, erm… a big dick. While I was baking, this seemed like the greatest idea in the world, but it didn’t go down well… so to speak. What I’m trying to say is I sympathise with Sid!

Bob: Bake one for me. We’ll eat it together while we watch Getting Sam Home. I’ll look after you, my angel.

Andrew: As for the Bus Conductress, I like to think she’s the same feisty character we saw during Series 2’s Forked Lightning. I seem to recall you took a shine to her.

Bob: I can’t remember her! I’m such a fickle fool. There’s a bizarre twist here… Nora is actually impressed! And, not only that, she wears the garter that Compo gives her to keep her wrinkled stockings up. And proudly gives him a tantalizing glimpse of it! I’m not sure how I feel about this, actually… it’s very funny, but would Nora actually do that? Although I can also see the argument that we need to see a certain affection reciprocated between them, otherwise you’re just left wondering why she doesn’t just call the police on him every week.

Andrew: Like I said, unpredictable.

Bob: I also wonder if this the episode that really kick-started the whole ‘wrinkled stockings’ phenomenon. I know they’d been mentioned in the series before now, but Compo’s hatred of them is major plot point of this episode. And it was around this time that wrinkled stockings became one of the major cultural identifiers of Last of the Summer Wine… you certainly wouldn’t read an article about the show (or about Kathy Staff herself) without them being mentioned, and I think that might have stemmed from this very episode.

Andrew: Yep. This will become one of the series’ most celebrated running gags and eventually leads to this oddity…


I’d love to know who plays the onlookers in this episode. They’re a small crowd and they don’t look like actors. I wonder whether they were locals, crewmembers, relatives of crewmembers… anybody know?

Bob: What strikes me most about this episode is that Alan Bell was spot on with regards to Gordon Wharmby – he is indeed ‘ absolutely real’ . It’s a fine performance, and a great encapsulation of that breed of middle-aged Northern men who spend all of their spare time in overalls beneath a car and need a garage (or a shed, or just some private space to retreat to, unencumbered by female tutting and clucking) to retreat to. I see a lot of my Dad in Wesley.

Andrew: Actually, what impressed me most about this one was the direction. I know I’ve harped on about a couple of production oddities, but the film sequences really sparkle in this episode. Bell’s signature landscape shots perfectly puncture the studio bound and character based stuff and one sequence, where Ivy returns to the café only to flee upon seeing Sid in his racing get-up is really dynamic. Just look at this shot…

All in all, good stuff.


  • Visit site
    March 28, 2013 7:27 pmPosted 9 years ago
    Chris Orton

    Do you chaps generally prefer the directing style of Lotterby or Bell?

  • Visit site
    March 28, 2013 7:34 pmPosted 9 years ago
    Andrew T. Smith

    It’s a bit early to tell. I love the grimy, rough and ready quality of the Lotterby years more so than I love Bell’s beautification of everything, but I find Bell’s work to be more visually interesting in other respects.

    • Visit site
      March 28, 2013 9:36 pmPosted 9 years ago

      I love Bells camera work. I hate to keep bringing up his book, but it’s a fascinating insight into his ideas about how to direct and the changes he made (whether you agree or disagree with them). I particularly like his decision to have so much movement in the camerawork. To use his quote

      “As often as possible, I like a scene to develop within the frame of a moving camera”

      • Visit site
        March 28, 2013 11:57 pmPosted 9 years ago
        Andrew T. Smith

        That’s it, I’m ordering the book. Sod the rent.

    • Visit site
      March 28, 2013 10:43 pmPosted 9 years ago

      To be honest, unless a director is incredibly idiosyncratic (or particularly terrible!) I hardly ever notice their individual styles. I tend to pick up more on writing and performances. It’s my fault, not theirs!

  • Visit site
    March 28, 2013 9:32 pmPosted 9 years ago

    Alan Bells book reveals that the person almost cast as Wesley was “the well known and experienced comedy actor Gordon Rollings”. Not a name I’m familiar with but looking at his imdb profile reveals that he was in loads of stuff, usually in small guest roles

    • Visit site
      March 28, 2013 10:48 pmPosted 9 years ago

      Ah, thanks – that’s really interesting! I recognise his face, but wouldn’t have been able to name him. I did see him in Bloodbath at the House of Death though, which I watched for the first time about a fortnight ago! It’s always good to see Vincent Price and Kenny Everett sharing screentime. It has an oddly sexy-looking Barry Cryer in it, too. Not a sentence you hear every day.

  • Visit site
    October 5, 2016 12:55 pmPosted 5 years ago
    Simon S

    Not sure whether it’s ever dawned on me that Wesley was a Dibnah-alike, and I’ve watched enough of his series 🙁

    Also never really considered the arrival of Bell (and the 1980s) as heralding a series of shifts, such as the rise (!) of the wrinkled stockings. Nice though it is to meet Wesley, he is a herald of the future which will soon kick in and result in a massive regular cast for our heroes to get lost in.

    Wesley, though, is easily the match of Sid and Wally in entertainment terms, even though he often becomes a failsafe excuse for an episode (“oh, what silly scheme has Wesley concocted this week?”). As here, when for all the talk of boosting Sid’s cred, you know full well who the test pilot will really be.

    It’s more fun to see Wesley out of his element, sitting up in the hills or in the café. It’s interesting that he will be brought back later, when so many other one-off characters never do.

  • Visit site
    April 24, 2020 8:50 pmPosted 2 years ago

    I am also indulging in a chronological run-through of LOTSW at the moment.
    Started just as the Coronavirus thing hit and I’ve been having an episode (sometimes 2!) every night and it’s proving to be a highly pleasant way to round off the day.
    The arrival of Wesley is really ushering the show into the era that I was more familiar with growing up., although the first ones I ever saw on TV were post-Seymour.
    But Wesley and Edie are so familiar and it’s great to have come so far on the journey.

  • Visit site
    April 24, 2020 8:56 pmPosted 2 years ago

    Bob, that’s so touching what you write about your dad.
    My dad was also the one who introduced me to some cutting edge stuff, Bottom in particular! I remember in ’95 he shouted me downstairs (I was 10 at the time!) and he said “You’ ll like this.” and it was the episode of Bottom called “Bottom’s Out” where they have to camp on Wimbledon common as a forefeit. I never laughed so hard in all my life. And that was thanks to my dad. He also introduced me to Fools. And Horses,. Steptoe and Son, Dad’s Army and many more. So I also know and appreciate that touch of familial sentimentality. 👍


Leave your comment

Your Name: (required)

E-Mail: (required)

Website: (not required)

Message: (required)

Send comment